I applied through a recruiter. The process took 2 weeks. I interviewed at Adyen (London, England) in Jan 2020
Interview
Coding test including 4 challenges as other reviews mentioned. Technical video interview discussing the challenge. Cultural fit interview about moving to Amsterdam for Adyen. On site interview were you meet the HR specialist, have a lunch with an engineer, two technical leads, two team leaders and a board member. The on site interview is a bit of a disappointment because you realise that a good office and a nice lunch at the rooftop are not enough for attracting you there. Rhetoric was different between other interview stages and the final which is annoying as both sides' time was wasted. If you are a technologist this is not for you.
Interview questions [2]
Question 1
How would you design a highly available payment processing system?
I applied through an employee referral. I interviewed at Adyen (Amsterdam)
Interview
1 Phone Interview
2 Technical task
3 Phone interview about technical task
4 Final round of interviews at the headquarters (3 in a row)
They took me to Amsterdam for the 4th stage, the final round of interviews. The 1st interviewer was completely lost, he asked his partner what they were supposed to do and he thought I was on the 3rd stage. He was about to review the code task, but then realized the mistake and started making questions. He clearly didn't prepare the interview.
After that, instead of getting into the 2nd interview the recruiter came to the room and told me that I didn't pass the 1st and I wouldn't have the next interviews to not "waste people's time". The reason? "The interviewer was expecting more detail in your answers".
He basically came unprepared, made generic questions and then complained about the lack of detail in my answers.
I've never seen an interview round being aborted like that even in the most picky innovation companies. Which kind of company brings a candidate to the last stage and dismiss him abruptly because of ONE opinion of an unprepared interviewer?
Long process, unfair, embarrassing and huge waste of time.
And needless to say that the recruiter promised a detailed feedback that never came.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Questions about databases and my reasoning on the code task. On final interview, questions about Java, Spring Boot and architecture.
I applied online. The process took 2 weeks. I interviewed at Adyen (Amsterdam) in Jun 2019
Interview
Utmost nonsensical application process ever. You are asked to complete a few tests (~3h) that are quite easy for everyone with decent programming skills. After that, you are invited for an interview in which you discuss what you did with two interviewers that not even educated in the field of software engineering. You can be outstanding and exactly what they want in terms of skills and have a great, positive and energetic character and even then they might reject your application based on one question at the end of a 45 minute interview with which they assume an entire character. The question is not even one that reflects a character or a set of skills. Their justification after for the rejection is basically a bunch of wild unjustified assumptions about your character that they felt were reflected in the interview. Even though you might be perfect for the job, a wild guess about your character is enough for them to reject the entire application process. What a joke. Just looking for a sec though the CV or just asking would prove them otherwise but no, let's just go with our wild instinct
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Why did you go with that implementation? How can you improve it?