Glassdoor users rated their interview experience at Applied Intuition as 33.3% positive with a difficulty rating score of 3.67 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty). Candidates interviewing for Engineering and Applications Engineer rated their interviews as the hardest, whereas interviews for Technical Recruiter and Sales Manager roles were rated as the easiest.
The hiring process at Applied Intuition takes an average of 14 days when considering 6 user submitted interviews across all job titles. Candidates applying for Software Development Engineer had the quickest hiring process (on average 14 days), whereas Software Development Engineer roles had the slowest hiring process (on average 14 days).
Introduction of the company
Job definition
My experiences
What I can bring to the company
What company offers in terms of career development
Questions and Answers
That was all I can remember
I applied through a recruiter. The process took 1 week. I interviewed at Applied Intuition (San Jose, CA) in Aug 2025
Interview
Screening with HR, for general idea about your experience, if it matches the role they are looking for, next was coding round, very fast interview process, they want to get the process done fast.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
General LC easy questions stack, queue, Linked list
I applied online. The process took 2 weeks. I interviewed at Applied Intuition (San Francisco, CA) in Aug 2025
Interview
The first call was an informal call, where the interviewer shared that it will be an unstructured and casual chats as as opposed to a structured interview. It was 30-minutes so largely introductory. After being moved to the next stage and interview, the interviewer said the next interview would likely be a more structured interview. However, that was not the case. The next interviewer also asked for an introduction and then did not ask any structured questions. Both calls felt redundant in structure, and the team never asked clear questions about my experience or impact in previous roles, since both calls were conducted as informal introductory chats. A few hours after my second interview, the team sent me an automated “end-of-process”candidate survey, which came a few hours after an automated link to a similar but separate “early process” candidate survey on the same day. It was a lot of emails related to a survey for one day. I was bummed, because the “end-of-process” survey was sent too early by a mistake and incorrect setup, so I discovered I was rejected before someone from the team told me. If the team used their ATS candidate survey as a more data-oriented solution, which is easier to reliably automate, and includes industry benchmark data, this wouldn’t happen. The lack of interview structure makes the process feel unfair and biased, and the automated emails sent in error created a poor candidate experience.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Both interviewers asked me to introduce myself, but nothing else structured