Bloomberg reviews

Too often, the people who were least qualified to the job, or those who were not the strongest at the job, but where close with higher ups would get promoted to Team Leaders or Managers. Then, they run around like chickens with their heads cut off because not only are they under-qualified, but their managers are also incompetent. EVERYTHING is a fire drill. There is not time taken to work on improving what we had, it was always about trying to up the last thing created - without maintaining and standardizing processes, how can you have a successful and useful product for the customer. Additionally, too many managers work scared as opposed to smart. No one knows how to push back and ask the right questions. It's quite a shame to see such an amazing company not know what type of management would be best to not only produce more, but reduce turn over.

- Analytics/Sales day-to-day job is very reactive, short-term, and task-based. There is no ability to see a project through from end to end. - Everything from communication to productivity is monitored and micromanaged by middle managers - While the company espouses transparency, there is no transparency when it comes to compensation and career progression - Career progression is solely based on business need and not on the strengths of the employee - Non-transferable skills to outside of Bloomberg (you get trapped in the Bloomberg bubble) - Promotions/Internal job changes with higher responsibility do not translate into higher compensation - More senior people at the company are the middle of the pack. Top talent find opportunities elsewhere with the education Bloomberg provides. Underperformers are weeded out through constant changes in departments and not being compensated well.