Worked in relatively new department... - Anonymous employee ADP Employee Review

3.0
Feb 11, 2010
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Since this was a fairly new department, it consisted of mostly young professionals so the ages were very close together. Very well educated people professionally and academically who helped build a brand new department through hard work and ideas. Able to develop procedures and policies that were implemented department wide. There was excitement because the future seemed limitless. Nothing like seeing something you helped work on be used by other. Benefits were top notch as well as sick/vacation days. Pay was also above average I would say. Lot of deadlines and multi-tasking but that's what made the work interesting.

Cons

The executive management motives were apparently not to grow the business, but to trim as much expenses as possible. All numbers and no sense. They stopped promotions and hiring and eventually opened "sister" sites in TX and India to help with work that we were already completing on time. No respect, the day after the last trainer from India returned, we were notified that we were being phased out. So three month training for the folks in India was good for the business but not the 3-5 years that the people in CA had put in.

Explore other reviews about ADP

5.0
Jun 17, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

work life balance continued education opportunity

Cons

segmented internal departments some unreasonable client escalations

2.0
Jun 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Established company with a long history and relatively stable business operations. - Provides a sense of job stability compared to many organizations navigating rapid changes in the current AI-driven market. - Lower risk of frequent restructuring or large-scale layoffs than many high-growth technology companies. - Opportunity to work with experienced employees who have deep institutional and domain knowledge. - Predictable work environment that may appeal to individuals seeking long-term stability over rapid change. - Strong choice for professionals who value job security and a steady career path in an uncertain economic climate.

Cons

- Documentation is limited or rusted, and many operational processes lack clear runbooks or standardized procedures, making onboarding and troubleshooting more difficult than necessary. - If you're coming from a modern, fast-paced engineering environment, the organization may feel behind current industry practices and tooling. - Internal politics can sometimes outweigh technical merit or execution. - There are teams with very long-tenured employees where change and innovation can be difficult to drive. - Decision-making often involves multiple layers of approval, resulting in significant bureaucracy and slower execution. - Processes can move slowly, and collaboration is not always transparent across teams, leading to inefficiencies and occasional confusion around ownership. - In some areas, roles, responsibilities, and operational processes are not clearly defined, creating unnecessary chaos and inconsistent ways of working. - Engineering standards and best practices vary considerably between teams, making cross-team collaboration challenging. - Organizational change tends to happen slowly, which can be frustrating for employees who are focused on modernization, automation, and continuous improvement.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All