ADP Benefits and Liabilities - Poor Leadership - Anonymous employee ADP Employee Review

2.0
Mar 2, 2010
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Physical Working environment, Hours of Operation, Health benefits and retirement options.

Cons

ADP is a company that exemplifies the "good old Boy network". Managers are whimsical and inconsistent regarding their expectations and job evaluation skills. They are hired to fill high level positions without any knowledge or background in the areas where they are suppose to lead. Sales personnel, especially in the insurance divisions are hired first, then learn the business while they are on the job. Most of these jobs should require the employee to have some knowledge and compliance education before "selling" to businesses that are relying on the ADP name to provide them with the best possible options for their company and employees. .

Explore other reviews about ADP

5.0
Jun 19, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Uncapped commission and great freedom

Cons

It’s a grind but worth it

2.0
Jun 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Established company with a long history and relatively stable business operations. - Provides a sense of job stability compared to many organizations navigating rapid changes in the current AI-driven market. - Lower risk of frequent restructuring or large-scale layoffs than many high-growth technology companies. - Opportunity to work with experienced employees who have deep institutional and domain knowledge. - Predictable work environment that may appeal to individuals seeking long-term stability over rapid change. - Strong choice for professionals who value job security and a steady career path in an uncertain economic climate.

Cons

- Documentation is limited or rusted, and many operational processes lack clear runbooks or standardized procedures, making onboarding and troubleshooting more difficult than necessary. - If you're coming from a modern, fast-paced engineering environment, the organization may feel behind current industry practices and tooling. - Internal politics can sometimes outweigh technical merit or execution. - There are teams with very long-tenured employees where change and innovation can be difficult to drive. - Decision-making often involves multiple layers of approval, resulting in significant bureaucracy and slower execution. - Processes can move slowly, and collaboration is not always transparent across teams, leading to inefficiencies and occasional confusion around ownership. - In some areas, roles, responsibilities, and operational processes are not clearly defined, creating unnecessary chaos and inconsistent ways of working. - Engineering standards and best practices vary considerably between teams, making cross-team collaboration challenging. - Organizational change tends to happen slowly, which can be frustrating for employees who are focused on modernization, automation, and continuous improvement.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All