DO NOT accept ANALYST roles - all you do is data management - Analyst Bloomberg Employee Review

1.0
Dec 7, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

the people are definitely the biggest pro - meet very capable people from all over the world you can do volunteering during working hours snacks bloomberg is good name to put on your cv - careful, I fell into that trap. anyone can be a team leader lots of free online courses good benefits you can do your CFA which Bloomberg then pays back after you´ve passed your exams you have to wait 18 months before you can move to a different role

Cons

The pros sound amazing - they are - unfortunately the job is so bad that it does not make up for any of them: 1)deceitful job title to attract better talent - I applied for an analyst role and neither I or any of the people within global data do anything else than data management. - if you´re applying for New Energy Finance , some of those roles are actual analysts who get a chance to use their brains.- data management only involves the specific tools used at bloomberg and so you dont develop any transferable skills outside bloomberg. This is what we do every day: set up Bloomberg´s data tools to automatically collect data on a regular basis. Again and again and again and again. Oh, and create tickers for this points. The most exciting thing you might do after a year or so doing this horrendous job, could be to become responsible for maintaining specific data or data management tasks or admin or vendors. I´ve spoken with lots of colleagues and lots of people feel mislead by the company and/or strongly dislike their day to day. There is a general lack of interest in most people who have stayed here for years and then got comfortable 2) hours are 8am to 6pm - as written in contract and you´re allowed to work from home if you´re ill or if the plumber is coming to your house. 3) You get treated like a child -actually i might have had more space to do think and do for myself when I was 5. This goes not only for global data but for the entire company. you get told what to do, how to do it and when to do it. No space to do things differently or to do different things. 4) quite a high turnover of people 5) managers and team leaders have very little idea of how to do their job and if they do they are given very little space to do things differently 6) incredibly rigid 7) if you're in global data ... I repeat - you're locked up in a misery of tasks - there is no need to have any sort of education to do what we do. 8)if you're in analytics (the 2 years path to go onto sales)... well most people quit within 4 to 6 months of how bad it is. My suggestion: ask very specific questions of what you would be doing during the interview to find out if you actually want this job. It will look bad if you quit before 2 years and if you stay then what valuable skills did you earn during your time at bbg? I think you will have a hard time trying not to feel embarrassed if you were to tell the truth about what you did at bloomberg.

Explore other reviews about Bloomberg

5.0
Jun 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great company, in this role you have the chance to learn about the financial markets, the terminal, and also you get client exposure.

Cons

Not really cons, culture is great.

2.0
May 12, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great Office, Free Snacks and plenty of social events

Cons

Be prepared for a heavily politicised culture — it's pervasive and affects day-to-day working life significantly. The organisation suffers from clear in-group favouritism at the leadership level, where certain groups are visibly preferred for opportunities, recognition, and advancement. This creates an uneven playing field and quietly damages morale for those outside those circles. Leadership collaboration leaves a lot to be desired. In four years, I didn't experience a single structured team-building or bonding initiative — a telling sign of how little investment goes into people and team cohesion. Perhaps most concerning is the approach to compliance. Raising legitimate concerns or challenging existing practices is met with significant resistance from senior stakeholders, rather than genuine engagement. A culture where pushback replaces accountability is one worth approaching with caution.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All