Poor compensation and so-so management; talented members are burdened with carrying the weight of the rest of the team. - Senior Consultant CGI Employee Review

3.0
Jul 1, 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Depending on the business group, the company provides decent options for flexible work schedules, telecommuting, and vacation. Minimal travel is required for most groups. While a huge number of the employees are average at best, there are a number of top-notch performers that keep most groups productive and profitable.

Cons

The overall compensation (salary, bonuses, health insurance, 401k, etc) is just short of atrocious. This compensation is very explicitly not tied to performance. Managers typically put little effort towards employee reviews, which end up overdue and lacking on content. The middle management is awful; most lack any form of natural leadership or ability to track basic tasks or manage even small groups. The upper management (Directors & Vice Presidents) are somewhat more competent, but that group is largely disconnected from the rest of the company (Consultants and Senior Consultants).

Explore other reviews about CGI

5.0
Jun 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work life balance, growth, quality

Cons

Less pay compared to market

1.0
Jun 16, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Cons

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All