Great place to either spend 2 years out of college or stick around for a life-long career - Consultant CGI Employee Review

4.0
Aug 14, 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Because its such a large group, there are many opportunities to move across projects and geographies to gain exposure to various clients and sectors. At the same time, the federal practice is firmly entrenched in what it does and so for folks who prefer not to move around so much, they can find stability in that area. And put down roots and really grow. If you are proactive, management works with you to find opportunities for growth, as well as opportunities to try out new projects if desired. The flex-time option is great. Management isnt concerned about face-time as long as you get the job done.

Cons

Because of the size of the company, it can take some time to navigate your way and figure out how to move across projects and different groups. Senior folks have more flexibility in choosing what they want to work on and moving across projects.

Explore other reviews about CGI

5.0
Jun 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work life balance, growth, quality

Cons

Less pay compared to market

1.0
Jun 16, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Cons

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All