Not as nice and good as they claim to be - Senior Consultant CGI Employee Review

1.0
Jan 17, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Nice perks like company car. You can be lucky and work at interesting projects on customer side.

Cons

It is consulting and it can be highly competitive with a very toxic atmosphere. Senior Manager are literally doing nothing when they witness very(!) erratic behavior. If you are billable and know one important director ppl can behave like absolute jerks including bullying co worker who are from other countrys. Never mention a good idea before writing it down… co worker will present it as their ideas. There are „good“ cgi employees these are the ones who tell the directors everything about the rest of the cgi employees. Only these „good“ one will get promoted. Everyone who is a referral of a director or other important individuals will be hired, just to not upset the director even if the individual does not meet any requirement.

Explore other reviews about CGI

5.0
Jun 9, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Inclusive workplace; great benefits; supportive of personal and professional growth; decent compensation for the area; - especially given the benefits; great leadership; strong culture and values.

Cons

Can be ups and downs if you are in a more volatile area of work which has contracts come and go. AI has increased that volatility across the industry and CGI hasn’t been immune. Individuals experience can vary by manager, but it’s a very good company.

1.0
Jun 16, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Cons

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All