Inconsistent project allocation affects work-life balance and growth - Senior Software Engineer Capgemini Employee Review

3.0
Jun 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good work-life balance depends on project

Cons

Project allocation is largely driven by business requirements, with limited flexibility in choosing development-focused roles. Technology exposure and career growth can vary significantly between projects. Performance evaluations may consider organizational "hygiene factors" (compliance, trainings, timesheets, mandatory activities, etc.) in addition to technical contributions, which can influence overall ratings. Rating and appraisal processes may sometimes feel less directly tied to project deliverables and technical impact than employees would prefer.

Explore other reviews about Capgemini

5.0
Jun 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good inclusive culture , supportive community

Cons

You have to be proactive and show above and beyond quality

1.0
Jun 30, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Cons

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All