employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

The Alan Turing Institute

Engaged Employer

Discriminatory, racist and biased environment - Fellowships Officer The Alan Turing Institute Employee Review

1.0
Aug 16, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Beautiful office at the British Library, flexible working arrangements, private health insurance and some great, professional people.

Cons

My experience at The Alan Turing Institute was deeply disappointing and traumatising due to a pervasive culture of discrimination, racism and favoritism. Promotions were often made behind closed doors, favoring nepotism over merit, dedication or hard work. Despite the company's claims of inclusivity and a commitment to EDI, these values were only present on paper, with no real progression opportunities for those who genuinely contributed. When concerns were raised, HR and senior management consistently sided with the offenders, further perpetuating the toxic environment. This lack of transparency and fairness made it clear that advancement was not based on merit but on personal connections and favoritism.

Explore other reviews about The Alan Turing Institute

5.0
May 25, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Top notch projects of national importance, great group of people.

Cons

Location should be changed. They should build their own campus.

1.0
Mar 28, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Free drink in the office Talented staff

Cons

Lack of clear vision and strategic direction from leadership, they have a very limited understanding of how teams actually operate day-to-day. The transformation and new structure were implemented without meaningful consultation with team leads, particularly around operational needs and how work is delivered in practice. This has resulted in decisions that disconnected from reality and have not addressed the core challenges teams face. While the intention has been to reduce silos, the outcome has been the opposite. Teams are now operating in more isolated ways than before, with less clarity on responsibilities and collaboration across functions. There has been a lack of care and consideration for staff throughout this transformation process. Redundancies have impacted individuals regardless of tenure, including those who were only recently recruited. For those remaining, workloads have increased significantly beyond their original scope, in order to cover gaps left by redundancies. It is also difficult to reconcile the organisation’s stated commitment to EDI with decisions such as making the EDI team redundant. Although the transformation has been described as complete, there is little evidence of tangible improvement. In many areas, processes and ways of working appear to have deteriorated rather than improved. Millions has been made into the ERP system, yet they do not appear to meet basic operational needs. Its ironic to see this at the national AI and data science research institute. The work culture feels more distant and less transparent. There is limited visibility into how decisions are made, and communication lacks clarity and consistency. This has contributed to a sense of disconnect between leadership and staff, and has impacted overall trust and engagement.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All