great research & consulting platform - Director Wood Mackenzie Employee Review

5.0
Mar 15, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

This is a unique company, akin to a sell-side research platform, without the buy/sell/hold recommendations. Truly independent and objective in their views and still fairly conservative in their forecasting methodology. It's by far the biggest commodity research/consulting firm, with broad coverage of the commodities value chain, very sharp research analysts, seasoned consultants and global footprint. Its clients span the globe - oil majors, independent E&Ps, governments, investment banks, asset managers, regulatory bodies, miners, refiners, global professional services firms, etc. The firm is now owned by another global entity and publicly traded company (Verisk Analytics). Various opportunities are available within Research, Consulting and Sales/Marketing. The Sales team (where I spent a number of years) is diverse and focused on client segments. The investment banking coverage team is solid and the offering is uniquely designed for global banking/research houses and smaller franchises. Wood Mackenzie's valuation metrics and workflows are widely known and still considered the industry standard.

Cons

I was treated fairly and although every organization has its flaws, I don't believe there is anything major that should prevent future employees from considering working at Wood Mackenzie. In fact, I encourage people to apply and make a positive change by contributing ideas and new/outside perspectives.

avatar
Wood Mackenzie Response
9y
Thanks very much for your feedback. We've passed this on internally. Wishing you success in your future endeavours!

Explore other reviews about Wood Mackenzie

5.0
May 31, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good work life balance and interesting work

Cons

Nothing much to say on this.

3.0
Jun 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Appreciated working with smart, driven colleagues; they were truly experts in their fields. The rigorous schedules we were on were strictly maintained, which usually made for a very organized structure and workload.

Cons

Leadership went through many changes and acquisitions while I was there. The mission seemed to keep changing, and it wasn't easy to maintain consistency in our reports with such leadership changes. Market analysts were often pulled onto consulting projects but were not paid as consultants. This is what pushed me to leave.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All