Personio reviews

3.2

48% would recommend to a friend

(443 total reviews)
avatar

Hanno Renner

52% approve of CEO

37% positive business outlook

Personio has an employee rating of 3.2 out of 5 stars, based on 443 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Personio employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Informationstechnologie industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

443 reviews
2.0
May 9, 2023

A unnecessarily risky trajectory

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Good benefits - Slightly higher than average salaries - Nice offices around Europe - Generally quite friendly people - A lot of autonomy (if you're based in Munich) - Product & Engineering work quite well together, they are one unit.

Cons

I joined Personio under the the pretence of a truly European company that lives up to the values that come with operating in this area of the global SaaS space, with friendly teams across the continent and a truly hybrid approach to work. Unfortunately, it feels like over the past year or so this has taken a turn, a lot of the most recent reviews here will argue negatively. Personally, I'd say this depends what you're looking for from a company. I'll bullet point the highlights here for where I've found cons from my perspective, and let the reader make their own mind up. - It is not "European". This is a Munich centric company, all high level decisions are made here (and more recently to some extent by our US remote based colleagues) and other offices simply need to follow suit. I'd go so far as to say a lot of decisions are actually made outside of zoom calls, so if you're not in the same office, good luck. Admittedly, this has improved somewhat with the move into Amsterdam however this yet to be seen if it will pay off long term. - The product is generally behind competitors and it is certainly not ready to be used to its full potential outside of DACH in its current iteration. In my time here the product has not changed much (1.5 years). At this stage of funding, Personio needs to be moving faster and unfortunately, after the hyper-hiring growth phase of last year it has moved a lot of initiatives to either a standstill or to be reworked by new senior hires to the 'n-th' degree over and over again. Generally it is getting more political too, your ability to do work that you feel really matters for your team depends on who you know above and how often you're actually allowed to be in a zoom call with the higher ups. - On the hiring point, we hired aggressively last year, and in this year, we have hired more strategically from FAANG. For me, this is a double edged sword. On the one hand things brings some exceptional talent (at a € premium) into the fold who have great experience. But on the other side; one, FAANG is not in the same space as Personio commercially so the strategic decisions will not naturally align in the immediate sense and two, this brings in talent who made their mark from a time when money was cheap and funding rounds were plentiful, this is no longer the case. Throwing bodies and € at a problem no longer works and for the ambitions of Personio, this strategy is risky (as per the title). - Async/Hybrid/Remote. Personio models itself as a true hybrid company. However most teams are based in different offices so it is effectively remote (unless you're in Munich). This causes 2 main side effects; 1, async processes become extremely important and honestly, it's pot luck if you get a team that does this well, some teams do, and other teams do this terribly. 2, professional development is weak. I can honestly say working here has made me feel like I have gone backwards in my abilities, I spend more time trying to find someone who knows the "Personio" way of doing something rather than actually solving a problem. - Culture. Again, quite a pot luck here, there are pockets of really friendly teams at Personio, unsurprisingly these have all been in teams that are located exclusively in the same office. However in recent times there has certainly been a noticeable shift to silos and people out only for themselves (the latest performance review round did not help here). Equally, going back to the point of teams being effectively remote causes a degradation in collaboration and empathy. I think if you're the type of person to want to just keep their head down and churn out tickets then you'll probably be ok, remote isn't all bad from this perspective, just don't expect much autonomy in the type of work you'll be doing. - Career progression is.. difficult. Unfortunately we've got to a place where it is honestly just easier to get another job elsewhere. The hoops you are made to jump through now are both extremely lengthy and promotion cycle is infrequent, but also require you to be relatively friendly with the committee who end up reviewing your case. The promotion committees do their best but this at the very least unconsciously comes through at promotion time. Most people I speak to are either actively, or passively looking for a new role unfortunately. - Technical literacy. On this point it is a very engineering focussed one. As mentioned above there are some extremely talented and smart people working at Personio but they are, in my opinion, unfortunately not being leveraged to their full potential. C Suite and management focus on features & product offerings so heavily that good engineering practices and principles are just not being followed. So if you like just churning out features without thinking about how this affects the wider business then you'll be fine. Don't expect to get the space to really architect something unless you're a staff engineer, and even then, they are clearly pushed into delivery of features to a huge degree.

avatar
Personio Response
3y
Hello, thanks for taking the time to leave us feedback and for providing actionable advice on your observations. Feedback is what helps us improve, and we appreciate the opportunity to ensure we’re providing a quality experience for every member of our team. If you’re open to it, I would welcome an open, honest, (and confidential) conversation, particularly to discuss your concerns on growth, hiring, and how we work/collaborate. As you know, we’re currently going through a period of intense growth as a company, as we have many times in the past. Our product and teams in many departments are growing rapidly, which is exciting, but also means that we’re currently iterating on our product strategy and how we work together. Our new product strategy, which prioritizes quality of product and increases the speed at which we ship features, is part of our company-wide effort to raise the bar and move our company from good to great. Our new ways of working include enabling our teams to hire talented people, regardless of where they’re based. This means that some teams are distributed, or even fully remote. Our ambition is to be a truly European top tech company, which is why we have invested a lot of time and effort into building strong offices across Europe. Half of our executive team and the vast majority of our senior leadership in the Product & Tech org are located outside of Germany. As we went through the world-changing years of Covid, we decided not to limit locations to a single product (or vice versa), but to follow the great talent in our European locations to give everyone the ability to work on the area of highest impact.. Given that we’re in similar time zones and that hybrid work is a reality in tech today, we’re focused on enabling every Personio in the PTech department to be successful, no matter where they are located. Overall, scaling teams is challenging and means a lot of change and some growing pains along the way. Our goal is to work together to create the best environment we can for our Personios, so any additional feedback you’d like to give would be valued. Please feel free to Slack me, or reach out to your People Partner – we’re both here to discuss and support you through these challenges. Sebastian, VP Engineering
1.0
Jan 11, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Unbelievable colleagues who I'd run through brick walls for, nice office and location.

Cons

From joining during a lockdown and having to onboard + work remotely for the first few months, I can honestly say the culture at the beginning was fantastic. The company was doing well, people were doing well, everyone was positive and optimistic, and it felt like I had found a company that lived by its values and cared for its employees. But as soon as things started getting tough and the company couldn't keep up with it's aggressive growth plans and targets or navigate the market conditions, things started turning south and true colours were shown... Here are a few cons (ie. reasons why I decided to leave Personio): Declining Product - Personio's platform is decent, but we have always been playing catch-up behind our biggest competitor. We were constantly told that our product team is 3x larger, so naturally we should be able to ship stuff faster. However in reality, Personio's onboarding tool hasn't changed in 2 years, still has an ugly boring UX that hasn't changed in 2 years, Reporting capabilities which has stayed the same for 2 years, developed a super basic Performance Management module which barely works for companies, and acquired a ticketing system which no customer has ever requested. Our biggest competitor on the other hand, is creating an increasingly-obvious gap between us and them, and building features that deliver more value for customers, making it almost a miracle is you win a deal against them given we're priced pretty much the same. Sales Leadership - I can't speak too much of other departments, but the leadership in the sales function is a disaster. Too many inexperienced team leads calling shots and creating a genuinely horrible culture (look at all the other reviews from Dublin SDRs for evidence). Due to performance across the company, they introduced what they termed as a "Performance-driven culture", which basically translated to hyper-micromanagement. When in actual fact the low levels of performance were down to massive over-hiring, terrible coaching, poor product and subsequently unrealistic targets. This resulted in a crazy attrition rate and roughly half of new joiners not passing probation, creating a really toxic cycle of hiring and firing (which as you can imagine did wonders for office atmosphere). There is more I could say, but I'd probably start getting specific people in trouble. Fake Values - when I started the values really felt like they meant something but I realise I was just being naive thinking that now. Couple of examples. #CustomerEmpathy - last couple days of the month you get the greenlight from a customer, however the person who needs to sign off is in hospital or on holiday. If we were empathetic to customers, we would work around them, however leadership would try and force you to send aggressive emails to try and get an innocent HR Manager to disturb their CEO or CFO just so we can add a bit of closed revenue to this month because we're so far behind target... #SeekToImprove - this is actually an Operating Principle (same thing pretty much). We had an Engagement Survey in May or June 2022 where the Sales team in London I believe scored the lowest in the company, or at least London as an office did. For a good couple of months nothing happened, nothing was actioned, nothing. It took my team lead, leading our team to believe our individual targets were getting reduced when in fact only the overall team target was (work that one out...), for us to end up having a couple of really open and frank discussions about how we're feeling. Rather than coming out with any action points we were just promised performance would get better just as things were, we brought up the low salary and the next month got given less than 3% increase (when realistically we were probably about 15-20% off market rate), we were promised they would work on the London office vibe but all they did was start introducing new joiners to the teams on their first day and did a couple of on-the-cheap socials in the office for a couple weeks, then as predicted they stopped that. The point here is, the company would bang on about being open to feedback, but in reality nothing ever happened. Last thing I will say on 'Fake Values' is how as a HR-tech we push out all of this Thought Leadership content, when actually in reality we don't do barely any of it ourselves. 4. Culture - building on the above a bit more, the London office is incredibly depressing and I genuinely feel sorry for new joiners having to experience it. Luckily my immediate team would be good fun, but the vibe across the office is really weird, with nobody talking to each other and no effort from the leaders in the office to improve things. For people's birthdays, managers would make no effort and once my manager literally just dumped a cheap chocolate cake from Sainsbury's on my colleagues desk still in the box and that was his happy birthday. For people joining the team, they have stopped making any effort to integrate them and feel welcome with welcome lunches or welcome drinks. I genuinely struggle to remember a time where my manager or another leader has rallied troops down the pub and bought a round. This all sounds trivial, but these are the little things that make people feel valued, engaged, and part of a team.

avatar
Personio Response
3y
Hello, thank you for taking the time to write such a detailed review. You've raised a large number of points and some of them we're already working on internally including some of the points you mention on team dynamics, office culture and compensation. As you can imagine on some of these points we are not in a position to comment on publicly but this feedback is appreciated and will be taken on board by us, in line with our values of seek to improve . We're sorry that your experience has not been as positive as we would have liked and we're happy to hear any further feedback or suggestions at Cassandra.Hoermann@personio.de to ensure we get the full details of your concerns in the depth needed to solve these points.
1.0
May 3, 2024

Wasted opportunity

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The salary was good and they provided you the option to relocate somewhere where they have an office.

Cons

The company operates in a highly bureaucratic manner, where discussions about "office politics" are all too common. Despite advocating for strategic discourse, the focus remains elsewhere. Role definitions are vague, and there's a glaring absence of a coherent change management strategy. Micromanagement pervades the culture, overshadowing any semblance of effective leadership. Regrettably, this has been my most unsatisfactory work experience, and I cannot in good conscience recommend it.

Viewing 199 - 201 of 443 Reviews

Glassdoor has 676 Personio reviews submitted anonymously by Personio employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Personio is right for you.